Wednesday, August 8, 2007

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - A

Book Review

While this site is primary preoccupied with movies, music, and TV, any site that claims to focus on pop culture would be remiss if it did not discuss the concluding book of the pop phenomenon of the past fifteen years: Harry Potter.

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by J. K. Rowling is a thunderous success in every sense of the word. In this, Hallows is that rarest of all pop culture events: one in which the hype comes primarily from the general public and in which the event surpasses the build-up.

SPOILER ALERT That said, what I’d really like to address in this article is the phenomenal, almost incomprehensible popularity of these books and how Deathly Hallows provides the necessary ending to the tale told within them (I’m assuming that the wild success of the films are fueled primarily by the novels). Several theories addressing the popularity of the Potter series have been proffered, all of which, I’m sure, are integral to its success. These include the fully-formed magical world, complete with history, from which the stories spring (the comparison’s to Tolkien’s Middle Earth are fully justified). Others include Rowling’s writing, immediate and lyrical. Still others hold up the characters. Each, from Voldemort to Tonks to Hermione to Harry himself, behave as humans, with recognizable drives, reactions, foibles, and strengths.

Still, while Harry’s popularity would not be possible without these, they alone are not enough to explain the ravenous hunger for this tale. That’s because, ultimately, Harry Potter isn’t about magical worlds or messianic destiny or even good versus evil. At its most basic, all Harry really wants is a home. A home that was denied him by the death of his parents at the hands (or wand, as it were) of Voldemort. The hunger for his mother and father and his inability to truly come to grips with their absence is on every page of every book. Of course, his view of what life would be like with his parents is idealized and made perfect. We (or those of us who grew up in families) know that there is no ideal home. We know home is a place of great happiness but also great pain. We know the heartache of having our expectations of how a mother and father should behave shattered by how they sometimes do. We know that parents are just humans, really. And so, as we travel with Harry on his journey to discover his parents, we are forced to confront our own broken pieces and disillusions. And, in the end of Deathly Hallows when Harry’s parents tell him, through the use of the Resurrection Stone, that they love him and are proud of him, we weep, too. Because we know how much we still long to hear that. And we understand, especially those who believe in an afterlife, how dying can be going home and why that’s a decision Harry is willing to make.

But if the story is ultimately about going home, why does that resonate with our current situation? A couple reasons, I suspect, that are tethered to each other. One is that between the hard sciences, a fundamentalist reading of scripture, and sociology, most of our meta-narratives have been destroyed. Christianity in particular, along with Islam and Judaism (the historical religions), have had their sacred books second-guessed until they died the deaths of a thousand cuts. We need meta-narratives, and, although Harry isn’t quite that big, it is a very big story that helps us understand ourselves.

Similarly, but on an even larger scale, post-modernism has so rattled then destroyed the foundations of our world and belief systems, we in Western Culture are longing to go home. But we know we can’t. Absolute Truth in its metaphysical sense seems impossible to determine. Our naivete has crumbled and there is no going back to a time and place of certainty and safety. The moorings of God, the Church, logic, and reason which once provided solidity to our world have been cut loose. We resonate with Harry and his frustration in only seeing part of the story. Even his priest (Dumbledore) knows only in part and seems full of more mysteries than truth. It’s for this reason that the oft-decried Epilogue is integral to this final book. Harry finally has a home, but he doesn’t know much more then than he did before. Instead, his home is purely relational. It is one that he’s built, bound to his wife, two kids, and good friends. It echoes quite strongly the ending of About a Boy in which Hugh Grant’s character finds himself in the same situation. And it provides, if we allow it to, a suggested way forward for us in these topsy-turvy times. It is in this that Deathly Hollows gives Rowling her greatest triumph and truly contributes to the human experience. A.

5 comments:

Lawyer said...

Nice. Very well written review. I have completely missed out on the Harry Potter phenomenon, save seeing (and not enjoying) the first movie.
I never knew just how human my parents were until I tried to answer my 3 year old's most difficult question: "Dad, can you die?"

Priest said...

thanks. i didn't really have any interest in the books until christmas before last when i started the first one in boredom. i read the first 6 in 3 months.

Doctor said...

Weird that the doctor should be defending religion to a priest but here goes. Maybe it's because I've been all the way down the rabbit hole and back. People are so well off in America that they don't "need" religion. Christianity is thriving in South America and Africa. Another 9/11 and the church attendance will swell again. In my most agnostic or atheist hour, I still couldn't explain why early Christians would be tortured to death for their beliefs unless they really believed their eyes. I've heard people call Jesus schizophrenic and we have James Cameron trying to prove him buried. We have the Da Vinci Code trying to make him a father. While I still can't explain the Holy Trinity thing, I find the longevity of the story and message remarkable. Everything else is just a flash in a pan.

In a recent conversation, I defended Judaism and Christianity above other religions since most of the others are based on a single man's writings. That doesn't make them wrong, just more susceptible to manipulation.

Priest said...

i'm a little surprised you felt the need to defend religion (or christianity, at least) based on my review. i wasn't offering a critique of christianity so much as acknowledging the fact that in western culture the primacy of christianity is no longer a reality. indeed, post-modernism and its trappings (pluralism, non-foundationalism) have eradicated a sense of Truth or ultimate reality, which, i think, we sorely miss and probably need. that isn't to say that i don't find these things in religion, only to say that the culture as a whole no longer does. I do partially blame this on a fundamentalist reading of scripture that treats all genres and all books of the bible the same (and, basically, scientific treatise or history in the modern sense).

I couldn't agree with you more that one of the real strengths of the bible is its multiplicity of writers over hundreds of years. and the very wide range of views they offer on many of subjects. i teach a bible in western culture class and that is one issue that i highlight repeatedly, the bible was written by the community, shaped by the community, and, ultimately, voted on by the community. it doesn't make it necessarily right, but it is a comfort to me.

Clint Williams said...

Priest - my compliments on a very well written review. I finished reading the book myself last night and was eager to read your review (I knew it contained spoilers so I chose to wait...)

I think your comments were excellent. Funny how it all comes down to the one thing, isn't it? Harry DID desire a home. Somewhere to belong. I thought it was interesting how he was content to die at Hogwarts, which he considered the only home he ever really had. Anyway - great review.